In my view, when you have Nobel Memorial Prize-caliber economists like Arizona State's Edward Prescott, Chicago's Robert Lucas and Eugene Fama, and Harvard's Robert Barro claiming that there are valid theoretical arguments proving that fiscal stimulus simply cannot work, not even in a deep depression--even though they cannot enunciate such theoretical arguments coherently--it is entirely fair for outsiders to conclude that academic economics as a profession is useless.
Monday, 20 July 2009
The state of economics
This week's Economist has some articles on the credit crunch and the science of economics. It is fairly critical of both macroeconomics andfinancial economics. My feeling is that it is a bit harsh to half-blame economics, particularly financial economics, for causing the crisis. There are a number of reflections on the Economist articles in the blogosphere by Stephanie Flanders here, Paul Krugman and Brad DeLong. Krugman is partly defensive, but DeLong isn't:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete